JP Morgan Chase

JP Morgan Chase Tower, New York City (by official-ly cool, Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan project April 4, 2008)

JP Morgan Chase Tower, New York City (by official-ly cool, Commons:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan project April 4, 2008)

Ground Zero

April 7, 2011 (updated August 7, 2021)

Stand in front of the JP Morgan Chase Tower at 270 Park Avenue in  midtown Manhattan in 2008 and you were at Ground Zero for systemic risk in the U.S. financial markets.

Today you still are (except that the Tower is being demolished to build a headquarters that will be much bigger).

JP Morgan Chase is by far the largest financial institution in the U.S., with $3.4 trillion in assets at the end of 2020, up from $1.6 trillion at the end of 2007. Second in total assets is Bank of America with $2.8 trillion.

The systemic risk posed by the giant corporation is best captured by the Office of Financial Research’s Bank Systemic Risk Monitor, which the office has published and refined since 2014.

JP Morgan Chase leads the list, of course, mainly because of its vast interconnectedness with other financial institutions. It’s only #2 in leverage, though, and for short-term wholesale funding like repo it’s way down the list at #13, which may help explain why JP Morgan is often the last man standing in a panic.

The company reported it was lending $296 billion in repo contracts at the end of 2020 and borrowing $208 billion, up from $169 billion and $126 billion at the end of 2007.  These amounts are netted, meaning that when the lending and borrowing is with the same institution it isn’t counted.   

Its gross repo loans in 2020 were $666 billion and borrowing was $578 billion. Back in 2007 the bank wasn’t reporting gross amounts. Total global repos were estimated at $13.4 trillion in 2021.

Editor’s Note:  The following section is RepoWatch’s April 2011 description of the systemic risk that JP Morgan Chase represented to the financial markets at the time of the financial crisis. 

*****

JP Morgan is the quintessential too-big-to-fail bank company.

It has $2.1 trillion in assets, second only to Bank of America with $2.3 trillion.[1]It has tripled in size in the past decade.[2] It is planning an aggressive expansion oversees.[3]

But more importantly, JP Morgan is too interconnected to fail.

That’s because it is deeply enmeshed in the market that posed much of the systemic risk during the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008, the repurchase, or “repo,” market:[4]

-JP Morgan is one of two clearing banks[5] for the most prominent corner of the U.S. repurchase market, the so-called tri-party market, where at the time of the crisis JPM was clearing for both Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.[6]In that pivotal tri-party role, JP Morgan wields one of the most powerful levers in modern finance. (Update: In 2018 JP Morgan Chase gave up its role as one of the nation’s two clearing banks for the tri-party market. The remaining clearing bank is Bank of New York Mellon.)

In 2008 JP Morgan withheld tri-party financing from Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, triggering their collapse – which caused the Reserve Primary money market fund to break the buck – and intensifying fears that Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley and maybe even JP Morgan itself would be next.  This was the seminal systemic risk most responsbile for the Federal Reserve’s dramatic intervention in the financial markets in 2008, according to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

-JP Morgan itself is one of the nation’s largest repo dealers, with $222 billion in loans and $263 billion in borrowings outstanding at the end of 2010.[7] 

-JPM’s broker-dealer subsidiary, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, is one of the 20 Primary Dealers authorized to do repos with the New York Fed.[8]

-Money market funds and hedge funds are critical players in the repurchase market.[9] JP Morgan has the nation’s second-largest money market fund family[10] and the nation’s largest hedge fund group.[11]

The JPM global bank holding company is also a leader in two other key areas of systemic risk during the crisis: Credit derivatives and securitization. Last year it had the most derivatives contracts of any U.S. bank holding company,[12] and it was the world’s largest dealer of credit default swaps, the credit derivatives[13] that helped fuel the housing bubble and felled insurance giant AIG. Before credit markets collapsed, JPM was the second-biggest commercial bank sponsor of asset-backed commercial paper (ABCPaper), which securitization companies sold to raise money.[14]

Some critics find JP Morgan’s trajectory under CEO Jaime Dimon disturbing because they believe the company’s size and interconnectedness gives JP Morgan an unfair competitive advantage and will force another taxpayer bailout at the next crisis.

“Jaime Dimon clearly wants to become too big to fail, too interconnected to fail, and – above all – too global to fail,” blogged M.I.T. economist Simon Johnson.15]  “This is terrific corporate strategy – and very dangerous for the rest of us.”

But Dimon said in the Washington Post he believes no company should be immune from failure,[16] not even JP Morgan.

Our company, J.P. Morgan Chase, employs more than 220,000 people, serves well over 100 million customers, lends hundreds of millions of dollars each day and has operations in nearly 100 countries. And if some unforeseen circumstance should put this firm at risk of collapse, I believe we should be allowed to fail.

 

Editor’s note: I collected the following footnotes for my own use, to help me keep track of some of  my online sources. I’m leaving them here in case they’re helpful to you, too, even though some links disappear over time.


[3] New York Times 6-22-10

[7] JP Morgan 10K

[10] http://www.cranedata.us/ Money Fund Intelligence, November 2010

[15] Baseline Scenario blog 6-26-10

One response to “JP Morgan Chase

  1. Mary:

    Don’t know what’s taken me so long to find your site. I first wrote about Repo in my essay “The End of an Era, Part I,” from June of 2008, and my “teacher” for Repo was the head of the religion department at Columbia University, Mark Taylor, and his book “Confidence Games: Money and Markets in a World Without Redemption,” published in 2004. A truly amazing book which approaches the financial system from a truly interdisciplinary perspective.

    To give you and your readers just a sample from page 172, from a Chapter entitled “Specters of Capital,” he had his eye even then on Repo and Interest Rate Swaps, which are coming under increasing suspicion as the place where US Treasuries which can’t be sold are “managed” to keep the yields down in the absence of adequate demand. Or so that’s what some think and I’m still making up my mind. Here’s Taylor, from 2004:

    “A repo involves a purchase (or sale) of a security with a firm commitment to sell (or buy) back the same security some time later (often a very short ime later). These bonds, in effect, have more than one owner. Traders often use repos to play the bond market when they are unwilling to commit funds long term. In some ways, repos are even stranger than notionals because they allow traders to invest without any cash and therefore greatly increase leverage. The bundling of repos and swaps in new hybrid products greatly accelerated the relative shrinkage of collateral.”

Leave a comment